An insightful article from The Atlantic about the sort of "vindictive protectiveness" toward "microaggressions" I observed to be increasingly prevalent among the Stein student community over the last few years. Worth taking some time to read. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/
If any of
you are interested in working for the federal government once you graduate or
even during school, you will [unfortunately] have to navigate the treacherous
journey through USAJobs. Luckily for you, I happen to be master sensei at
USAJobs. Shameless plug: I have worked in the federal government for almost
seven years in several different positions and I have turned the USAJobs
application process into a science. I’m here to give you some general tips and
tricks to getting through it while avoiding dumb administrative mistakes that
can jeopardize your application. ***Keep in mind this is a very brief overview.
For seriously detailed information, get in touch with me. I am more than happy
Create an account. That’s simple. I
don’t think I should have to tell you how to make a password etc, etc. We are
Make PDFs of everything (I mean
EVERYTHING) and upload them into saved documents. When you have all of these
uploaded to your profile, it makes the application process much more efficient
because the agency’s application can access them directly via the USAJobs
Your resume, which should be only one page.
Okay, so you were the best at handball in middle school, no one cares anymore!
Leave it out!
A cover letter. You should probably
get administrative guidance on this because I have never once submitted a cover
letter in a job application. Sorry I’m not sorry.
Your transcripts. Unofficial
transcripts are totally fine. If you get an offer, the agency might request official
ones- no need to go all out just for an application. In my case, I have just
used my school’s web portal showing I finished my bachelors, a pdf of the
webpage showing I was at an NYU grad program (that I never finished), and my law
school grades and schedule of what classes are in progress.
A writing sample. Find your best
piece of legal writing and upload it.
**For the Veterans** Upload a PDF of
your DD-214 and a VA disability letter (I can show you how to get those things
instantly on the internet.)
Now you are ready to start hunting
the job posting:
Alright! If everything checks
out, scroll back up and click APPLY ONLINE!
You will be directed to a new
page. The next process is the last process and, arguably, the worst process. It
varies from agency to agency. Generally, you will begin by verifying your
demographic information: social security number, name, address, preferences.
Then you get to the good stuff; a slew of tedious and redundant questions that
evaluate if you’re qualified for the position. Answer honestly! They are
somewhat multiple choice. Example: What is your experience giving oral
presentations? A) I have studied this but never actually done it. B) I have
done this on some occasions under supervision. C) I have given presentations
frequently without supervision. D) I am an expert at giving presentations and
have given presentations to upper-level management. Select one and continue.
This will go on for a while, sometimes. The questions quantitatively evaluate
your experience and qualifications.
You will get to a final page
that asks what supporting documents you would like to upload in order to
substantiate your application. Just check the boxes and continue! See why
uploading everything first is key?! ;)
You get to review all of your
answers and then submit your application.
Eventually you will get an
email with a score that shows how you’ve been rated, if you’ve been referred to
a selecting official, if you have been found unqualified/not selected/ineligible,
or if your application was incomplete and you missed the boat.
Stein Scholars Participate in Alternatives to Incarceration Event
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014, the Stein Scholars Program sponsored "Alternatives to Incarceration," an event highlighting the importance of alternative approaches to incarceration and their potential benefits, especially for populations with mental health issues or socioeconomic challenges. The speakers were:
Carol Fisler, the Director of Mental Health Court and Alternative-to-Detention Programs at the Center for Court Innovation.
Jim St. German, the founder of Preparing Leaders of Tomorrow (PLOT), a nonprofit organization that provides mentors to youth involved with or at risk of entering the juvenile justice system.
Both speakers drew on their professional and personal experiences with the justice system. Carol Fisler discussed recent research in mental health courts, and her work with Mayor De Blasio's task force on mental illness in the criminal justice system. Jim St. Germain discussed his personal experiences with the juvenile justice system and how it led him to the work he does today. A lively Q&A session followed.
Stein Scholars kicked off their 2014 season of service on October 1st with a Discussion About Domestic Violence aimed at raising awareness and promoting understanding. The conversation focused on three perspectives: The Batterer, The Battered and The Public. The first two points of view were explored via web clips followed by Q&A/debates.
Deanna Baumle introduced the first clip, in which we learned about Emerge, an abuser rehabilitation program in Massachusetts. A clip of a video was played, featuring a group interview of three anonymous men who were receiving counseling at Emerge. I can't say that they all sounded remorseful. But they all seemed to use the language prescribed by the program: partner, entitled, rationalization. All of these men were court ordered to enroll in the program. David Adams, co-director of Emerge, said that the men who are court ordered to participate in counseling often do better than those who enroll voluntarily. The reason for this is that the men who are forced to be there will generally stay in the program longer. The Battered
Saundra Ramirez led the next section of the talk. Leslie Morgan Steiner is the author of Crazy Love, a memoir that details her marriage to an abusive spouse. In her talk, she discusses some of the ways in which abusers lull their victims into a sense of security before they strike. She spoke of the way her ex-husband created the illusion that she was the dominant partner in the relationship. Then he moved into the next phase: isolation. They moved to a small New England town where she didn't know anyone and the neighbors would not be close enough to hear the beatings. Eventually, he choked her, and banged her head against a wall. A week later she married him
Steiner never thought of herself as a victim. She believed she was a very strong woman in love with a deeply disturbed man. And she was the only person who could help him. And that mindset leads some women to stay. Some victims stay out of economic necessity. And some stay out of a reasonable fear that they will be murdered. As Steiner points out, 70% of domestic violence related murders take place after the break up.
The Public Public perception of domestic violence was examined by discussing the two faces of Ray Rice, the pride of New Rochelle, a man committed to his community and inspiring young men and women. And the Ray Rice we have all come to know, a man who is capable of punching his fiancee in the head, knocking her unconscious, spitting on her, and dragging her out of an elevator by her feet. Allison Richman led this part of the discussion as she and Rice are alumni of the same high school. She raised questions of what is private v. public? What is the NFL's responsibility, if any? Should Rice be allowed to attend events at the high school? The most disheartening anecdote from this portion of the event was a quote from a fourteen year old student at Allison's old high school, "well, if he did that, then she did something to deserve it." If the goal of the event was to inspire a rousing debate about the responsibilities of the victim... Then mission accomplished.
The entire event was set in motion by an announcement made by Nicole Abene regarding a couple of ways in which those interested could get involved with this cause:
Please join us on Tuesday, October 21st as we celebrate two Fordham Law alums and Stein Scholars who have shown their dedication to work in the service of others. The reception will be from 6:30-8:30 p.m. in the Constantino Room of the new Law School building.
FUA ATTA-MENSH '04- Is currently the director of litigation at the Urban Justice Center.
ERIC MONTROY '03-has shown his dedication by working in the field of criminal defense.
There will be hot and cold hors d'oeuvres served, as well as wine and beer.
On March 26th, The Stein Scholars program presented a panel conversation about gun control, the Second Amendment and the aftermath of the Supreme Court's 2008 decision, DC v. Heller. This event was inspired in part by artist Pedro Reyesexhibition "Palas Por Pistolas" (shovels for guns) on temporary display in the Ildiko Butler Gallery in the Lowenstein building lobby.
Father Gregory Waldrop, executive director of Fordham's art collections, began the discussion by showing a poignant video presentation showcasing Pedro Reyes's transformative exhibit. Palas Por Pistolas began with broadcast media invitations for the inhabitants of Culiacan, Mexico to offer up their guns in defiance of a pervasive culture of fear brought upon the city by the local drug cartel. For each of the 1,527 guns received by the authorities, Palas Por Pistolas issued a shovel to plant a tree, 1,527 in total, thus turning each "agent of death into an agent of life."
The event continued with a panel discussion regarding the status of gun regulation efforts in America today as well as the legal aftermath of the Heller decision among the lower courts. Panelists included:
Leah Gunn Barrett - Executive Director of New Yorkers Against Gun violence. Leah has played an important role in the passage of New York's SAFE Act as well as educating the public officials alike in her endeavor to promote responsible gun ownership.
Saul Cornell, Ph.D - Paul and Diane Guenther Chair in American History at Fordham University. Saul brought a historical perspective to the "originalist" legal construction arguments that lie at the heart of the debate over the Second Amendment's right to bear arms. Saul clarified the practical purpose of the Second Amendment at the time of its ratification and criticized conservative originalist arguments as overly steeped in modern ideology.
Adam Skaggs - Senior counsel for Mayors Against Illegal Guns, a national bipartisan coalition of mayors and grassroots supporters working to pass gun legislation. Adam provided a critique of the Supreme Court's "intermediate scrutiny" standard used in its construction of Second Amendment rights in Heller. He also spoke about later court decisions that have distinguished Heller, such as the 9th Circuit's upholding of gun lock requirements and the Castleman case, in which a perpetrator of domestic violence was prohibited from gun ownership.